Back to LLMs Mind Map
中文·English
LLMsID: scaling-laws

Scaling Laws

缩放定律
🎯Core Definition
Scaling laws state that the cross-entropy loss follows power laws in parameters N, data D and compute C: L(N)NαL(N) \propto N^{-\alpha}, L(D)DβL(D) \propto D^{-\beta}, L(C)CγL(C) \propto C^{-\gamma}, with α≈0.076 and β≈0.095. Kaplan's law argued parameters matter more; the Chinchilla law (2022) corrected this: data and parameters should scale together, with optimal data ≈ 20× parameters — a 70B model needs ~1.4T tokens, hence 'data beats parameters'. The LLaMA family was trained at exactly this ratio.
💡Use Cases
picking model size and token budget, estimating training cost, extrapolating performance and choosing architecture.
Key Problems Solved
the optimal (N, D) split under a fixed compute budget. Early models like GPT-3 were heavily undertrained; Chinchilla showed data gets more return per FLOP at fixed compute. Power laws also enable extrapolation: runs at 1e20 FLOPs predict loss at 1e24 FLOPs within ~5% error, justifying the 'experiment small, scale up' engineering route.
🎯5 High-Frequency Exam Points
1
Power-law forms? Kaplan vs Chinchilla differences?
2
Why does data matter more than parameters at fixed compute?
3
Chinchilla's content and how the 20:1 data-to-param ratio was derived?
4
Do scaling laws extrapolate forever? Saturation and emergence?
5
Using scaling laws to choose N/D and estimate training cost?
Updated 2026-08-12
🎯
Test Your Knowledge: Practice Questions for "Scaling Laws"
Single choice pitfall questions with instant feedback and mistake tracking.
🚀 Start Card Practice
Previous CardAuto Metrics vs LLM-as-JudgeNext CardModel Families & Evolution

🔗 More LLMs Knowledge Cards

Agent & Tool CallingAlignment Tax & Preference DataScaled Dot-Product AttentionAttention Variants MHA/MQA/GQA