Back to LLMs Mind Map
中文·English
LLMsID: model-families

Model Families & Evolution

模型家族与演进
🎯Core Definition
Mainstream open-source families differ in architecture details and training recipes: LLaMA — BPE tokenizer with a 32K vocab (128K in LLaMA-3), SwiGLU + RMSNorm + RoPE, GQA from 70B up, trained on 15.6T tokens; Qwen — 152K vocab (efficient for Chinese, ~1.2 chars/token), tied embeddings, GQA standard, YARN for long context; DeepSeek-V3 — 671B total / 37B activated MoE, MLA low-rank KV compression, 128K vocab, trained on 14.8T tokens. Overall trend: exploding token budgets, larger vocabs, and MoE + long context as defaults.
💡Use Cases
model selection, interview comparisons, and tracking the technology evolution.
Key Problems Solved
turning 'the model' into comparable engineering decisions — Qwen for Chinese-heavy workloads (better vocab and Chinese data share, lower per-token cost), DeepSeek for code/reasoning (MoE with 37B activated out of 671B gives more capacity per FLOP), LLaMA for general English ecosystems (richest tooling and resources); it also explains why the tokenizer drives cost and speed: a bigger vocab packs more info per token but costs more embedding/softmax parameters.
🎯5 High-Frequency Exam Points
1
LLaMA-3 vs Qwen: tokenizer and positional-encoding differences?
2
What is DeepSeek-V3's MoE + MLA configuration?
3
How does vocab size affect Chinese token efficiency and inference cost?
4
What does the token-scaling trend (1.4T → 15.6T) imply?
5
How does each family support long context (YARN / positional surgery)?
Updated 2026-08-12
🎯
Test Your Knowledge: Practice Questions for "Model Families & Evolution"
Single choice pitfall questions with instant feedback and mistake tracking.
🚀 Start Card Practice
Previous CardScaling LawsNext CardLong-Context Extension

🔗 More LLMs Knowledge Cards

Agent & Tool CallingAlignment Tax & Preference DataScaled Dot-Product AttentionAttention Variants MHA/MQA/GQA