NeetCode #906LC-73MediumMath & GeometryBlind 75NC 150NC 250
← Back to All Problems#906 · #73 · Set Matrix Zeroes(矩阵置零)
📌 Problem Statement & Constraints
Given an
m x n integer matrix, if an element is 0, set its entire row and column to 0, modifying the matrix in place. Constraints: 1 <= m, n <= 200, -2^31 <= matrix[i][j] <= 2^31 - 1. The follow-up asks for an O(1) extra-space solution.💡 Core Algorithmic Approaches
- Use the first row and first column of the matrix itself as the marker arrays: a
0written atmatrix[i][0]records that rowimust be zeroed, and a0atmatrix[0][j]records that columnjmust be zeroed. - Before those marker cells are overwritten, save two flags recording whether the first row and the first column originally contained a zero.
- First pass over the inner submatrix
[1..m-1] x [1..n-1]writes the markers; a second pass over the same submatrix reads them and zeroes cells. - Finally apply the two saved flags. Order matters: the inner submatrix is processed before the first row and column, so their markers are still intact when read.
💻 Benchmark Python3 Implementation
class Solution:
def setZeroes(self, matrix: List[List[int]]) -> None:
m, n = len(matrix), len(matrix[0])
first_row_zero = any(matrix[0][j] == 0 for j in range(n))
first_col_zero = any(matrix[i][0] == 0 for i in range(m))
# use the first row / column as marker storage
for i in range(1, m):
for j in range(1, n):
if matrix[i][j] == 0:
matrix[i][0] = 0
matrix[0][j] = 0
# zero the inner cells using the markers
for i in range(1, m):
for j in range(1, n):
if matrix[i][0] == 0 or matrix[0][j] == 0:
matrix[i][j] = 0
# finally handle the first row and column themselves
if first_row_zero:
for j in range(n):
matrix[0][j] = 0
if first_col_zero:
for i in range(m):
matrix[i][0] = 0⚡ Complexity Deep Dive
⏱️ Time Complexity
O(m * n): a constant number of full passes over the matrix.
💾 Space Complexity
O(1): only two boolean flags beyond the input.
⚠️ Interview Pitfalls & Follow-ups
- Zeroing the first row/column before the inner pass: that destroys the markers, so the first row and column must be handled last.
- Forgetting the two flags: a zero that originated in the first row would be lost once the marker cells are overwritten.
- Writing markers into the inner cells themselves: that creates cascading false zeros.
- Using a separate
rows/colsset: correct, but it costs O(m + n) space, which the follow-up explicitly forbids.